John Y’s Musings from the Middle: Most Important Political TV Debate

What do you believe is the most significant exchange in a TV political debate show over the last 25 years?

As for me, there are a whole lot of answers that come to mind. Serious–in fact, grave–points being made by serous leaders. Important policy being heatedly debated by brilliant minds, new ideas breaking through and the like.

But I would select a very different moment that called out the most popular debate show of this period for what it –and copycat shows like it —really are: much more tv theater playing for ratings than genuine debate seeking out the truth. And the guest did so in a very human and effective way.

I spent a good chunk of my young life voraciously absorbing these tv political debate battles. But eventually I began to tire of them and feel a similar disappointment to when my grandmother explained to me at age 7 that tv wrestling wasn’t all real. I didn’t feel deceived. But did feel disappointed that I was manipulated and didn’t know it.

Give me Firing Line with William F Buckley, Jr. Give me Charlie Rose. Give me Dick Cavett. Give me—a conversation with a friend or family member over coffee that isn’t measured in decibels but is instead an honest exploring of an idea without fear of it leading to a conclusion that is inconsistent with the political narrative I embrace. Give me a conversation in which I learn something new rather than reinforce a comfortable but mundane position I don’t even fully embrace if I were honest with myself.

Give me, in short, an honest moment. Like the video clip below.

And please don’t let Jon Stewart’s politics cause you to miss the non-partisan point he makes. Yes, he does revert to some low brow tactics, but he brilliantly and successfully makes as important a point as any that face our citizenry today, in my view.

We are a divided nation today in part for substantive political policy ideas we disagree on– but also, I believe, in part because we all mimic what we see and have adopted the belief that to engage in political dialogue means we musta eviscerate our “opponents” arguments at all costs–including personal insults and clever debating tactics in order to “win” at any cost. But I can’t help believe that we are all really losing something more valuable as we engage in this corrosive pastime.

This is my choice for most important tv political debate moment in the past 25 years:

The RP’s Weekly Web Gems: The Politics of The Screen

The Politics of The Screen

MGM is preparing for an initial public offering that could be propelled by the studio’s newest James Bond film. [Financial Times]

Martin Scorsese is being sued for breach of contract for a film he allegedly agreed to direct, but didn’t. [The Hollywood Report]

Making movies with excess everything was Tony Scott’s modus operandi. [NYT]

California appears poised to make a law requiring individuals working in the entertainment industry who would have unsupervised access to minors pass a criminal background check. [LA Times]

Jason Grill: The Paul Ryan Pick

John Y’s Musings from the Middle: Your Inner Jack

Your Inner Jack?

Yeah, c’mon….admit it.

Every guy, deep down, has an inner-Jack Nicholson wanting to get out.

You know what I mean. Some prefer to call it the “wild man” or the “id” (those who fear it call it less flattering names) —but it’s there and is a vital creative life force in all men that is better to be embraced and let out for exercise than contained, condemned, suppressed and ignored.

To hate it is to hate ourselves.

To kill it is to kill an essential part of ourselves.

So, go for it. Give in –at least once this weekend–to your inner Jack.

Video of The RP at the World Series of Poker Final Table

At long last, thanks to the folks at ESPN, WSOP.com, Caesar’s, Veetle.com, and our extraordinary Webmaster, Justin Burnette, we are now proud to share with you video from The RP’s impossible journey to the final table of the 2012 World Series of Poker, $1000-buy-in no limit Texas hold ’em event. (Click here to read his full account.)

Specifically, the video below shows the final twenty minutes of The RP’s four day, 40 hour marathon in which he finished in 8th place out of the original 4,260 entries.

The folks at ESPN obviously knew The RP’s best side, so most of the video of the final table is shot from behind our erstwhile blogger, who sits in front center of the screen, back to camera, in a white shirt with blue sleeves and a tan No Labels hat — which unfortunately, had no label on its back.  So we miss his poker face — and the naive surprise in his eyes for having the extraordinary luck to be where he was.

But, we do get to see some entertaining hands in these 20 minutes: The RP surviving two all-ins in which he was the big underdog; an opponent with a much larger stack getting eliminated, thereby earning The RP an additional $14,000; and the final hand in which The RP gracefully exits the stage.

Enjoy:

The RP’s Weekly Web Gems: The Politics of The Screen

The Politics of The Screen

On the TV ‘screen’, the head of PBS is “extremely disappointed” by Mitt Romney’s suggestion that the federal government would slash federal funding for the programming service under his administration. [WaPo]

Warner Brothers has shuttered Warner Premier — it’s direct-to-video publishing arm — citing shifting business models and priorities. [THR]

Dale Olson, one of Hollywood’s most iconic publicists, died this week. He represented the likes of Rock Hudson, Shirley MacLaine, Steven Speilberg, Gene Kelly, and Joan Crawford. [NYTimes]

Movie etiquette changing? Some theaters are now welcoming heckling and cell phones and more. [Chicago Daily Herald]

Actor-turned Governor-turned actor again Arnold Schwarzenegger makes his first appearance in a film since leaving office in ‘The Expendables 2’, opening this weekend. [NYPost]

 

 

John Y’s Musings from the Middle: Paul Ryan – A Missed Opportunity?

The first thing I thought of when I Googled news of Paul Ryan being Mitt Romney’s choice for VP was “He looks like Romney’s Mini Me.” I thought I’d start off my post with this observation but decided to Google “Paul Ryan and Mini Me” to make sure no one else had used it already. Apparently, Mitt Romney had. Reportedly, Mitt when informing Ryan of his choice said, “Mini Me, you complete me.” Which is an even funnier than what I was going to say using the Mini Me line. So, I’ll just leave it at that. I can’t improve on Mitt’s own words. Just read them and pretend like Mitt was joking. Hilarious!!

Things like that seem to happen to Mitt a lot. He intends for things to be taken one way, and they end up being taken the other, more obvious way. It’s an endearing quality because Mitt isn’t doing it as an act. It’s sweet. It humanizes him. Really.

I suspect with his VP choice  Mitt was trying to emulate the most successful VP pick in modern presidential campaigns: Bill Clinton’s choice of Al Gore. It was a surprising and bold move –and like Mitt done by a challenger running against an incumbent president. It created momentum because it reinforced Clinton’s personal brand (DLC democrat) and “just worked” despite politically logical reasons to go a different way. Clinton, of course, didn’t say to Al, “Mini Me, you complete me.” And the pair went on to win the presidency and vice-presidency and govern for 8 years.

I think Mitt was trying for this same formula but, again, shanked it. Sure, Ryan is similar to Romney but not in a way that creates electoral dynamism. He comes off more like Mitt’s younger brother who majored in economics instead of finance as opposed to a fun and synergistic compliment to Mitt.  But there are those who could have fit that bill. In my opinion the obvious selection for Mitt’s VP who could have provided the same electoral dynamism we saw in 1996, is obvious. Bill Paxton, star of HBO’s Big Love.

Paxton, like Romney, is an outsider and Mormon. He’s a very successful no-nonsense businessman whose small business expertise could temper Romney’s narrow business image as more of a financier than everyday American businessperson, like Paxton’s character. Paxton also has cross-over appeal to democrats—both male and female. When polled, democratic males 18-85 answered “D” by an overwhelming majority to the question, “Which one of Bill Paxton’s wive’s is the hottest? A) Barb, B) Nicki, C) Margi or D) All of them? And another overwhelming majority of democratic males answered “yes,” to the follow up poll question, “If a republican vice presidential candidate could juggle three hotties and still pay all the bills, would you be more likely to vote for that ticket?”

Conversely, female voters from both parties polled about Paxton scored him high on “security issues,” “pro-life,” “immigration,” “family values” and “ideal second husband” (interestingly, polling data showed the fact he’d have to be shared with three other women can be a plus for a second husband). And both male and female voters from both parties felt Paxton’s ability to maneuver the temperamental  ingénue Margi was a good indication he could work with House of Representatives. A similar percentage believed having managed to keep the attractive but matronly Barb happy all these years showed Paxton could deal adeptly with Sen Mitch McConnell’s dryly sensible and scolding leadership style. And the fact that Paxton seemed to keep Nicki (Chloë Sevigny) happy as a sister-wife had no political significance according the polling,  but almost all polled considered it “friggin’ amazing.”

Other pluses of a Paxton choice for veep is that he has a casual yet connected air about him to contrast with what some consider Romney’s uptight remoteness. Everyone knows Utah (where Big Love is set) is the country’s most conservative state. So Paxton could simultaneously burnish Romney’s conservative bona fides while also eating into democrats Hollywood’s fundraising edge.

Of course, polygamy has been outlawed by the Morman faith and it’s supposed to be politically incorrect (even taboo) to ever mention it was part of the Mormon faith tradition. But in this context it is a clear political plus. I mean, c’mom,  let’s be serious. Does anyone believe Joe Biden is suave enough to handle 3 wives?! In the upcoming Centre College debate, Paxton wouldn’t even have to be very knowledgeable about policy. He could merely try to convince voters that Mitt Romney really is a lot like his character in Big Love and it would be a blowout of Biden. An ad running before the debate with each of the sister-wives starting into the camera saying, “Joe Biden, I know Bill Hendrickson (Paxton’s character in Big Love), Bill Hendrickson is a husband of mine. Mr Biden, you are no Bill Hendrickson” would be a potential knock-out punch.  A republican Lloyd Bentsen moment on steroids –and Viagra. Even better it would benefit the presidential candidate, Romney, even more than the vice-presidential candidate.

And here’s the beauty part. Romney, when notifying Paxton of his choice could still have said, “Mini Me, you complete me.” And Paxton is so cool that everyone would have taken it as a hilarious insider Hollywood joke. Romney would have realized that he stumbled into a brilliant comment that was genuinely funny. And started laughing himself at how inadvertently hysterical he was. And if all that happened standing on stage next to Bill Paxton, it would have been Mitt Romney’s finest, funnest and most human moment in the campaign. And in an odd way, would have perhaps been Mitt’s most “presidential” moment of the campaign yet.

Heck, even conservatives would have to admit they kinda liked Romney on that night.

Jimmy Dahroug: The Ryan Choice from Different Perspectives

As a fan of Christopher Guest Movies, I was pretty pleased.

I always thought Mitt Romney resembled Fred Willard.
Paul Ryan looks a bit like John Michael Higgins, another Christopher Guest Alum.
Sure, I kind of see Jake Gyllenhaal, or the guy who plays Gabe on The Office.
Just watch Best in Show or A Mighty Wind – then we can have a real debate!
As a strategist, I was pretty shocked.
Paul Ryan was one of the last people I thought Romney would choose.  In my mind, it really came down to Portman and Rubio.
I think Romney already had the base on board (due in part to the Supreme Court ruling) – and Portman or Rubio (among others) could have helped pleased the conservative as well as helped in other ways and without exposing Romney to such risk.
In terms of substance, I’m not even sure Romney shares that much in common with Paul Ryan.  While both would like to call themselves fiscal conservatives – Romney can be considered pragmatic, and his risks are calculated.  That’s just not Paul Ryan.
From what I can see, Ryan poses such unnecessary risk.  There may be some critical information we’re just not privy to – even intangibles like chemistry, rapport…  Those qualities do matter.
Still – this is a big risk for Romney.
As a Democrat, I hope the Obama team does not underestimate Paul Ryan.
1. Due in part to economic uncertainty, voters took a chance on Obama in 2008.  Although Obama can argue the Country would have been worse off without his actions in office, voters are still feeling a challenging economy.  They may be willing to take a risk with Ryan when they wouldn’t at any other time.
2. Paul Ryan, himself, is prepared and effective. He simply should not be underestimated.
No matter how confident the Obama team is in the substance of its arguments against Paul Ryan, they cannot take him lightly.
Ryan is not the caricature fire-breathing conservative that is supposed to scare kids and small animals.  He won’t raise his voice like Chris Christie. Paul Ryan will listen and he will calmly and respectfully respond.
Saying Paul Ryan does his homework is an understatement.  Agree with Ryan or not, he knows the details and the big picture.  He’ll anticipate every argument Democrats can make and he’ll be prepared to respond.  The Obama team needs to be just as prepared.
In 1980, the Carter campaign painted Reagan as a dangerous extremist.  What the American people saw was a pleasant man who didn’t seem at all like the monster they had come to expect.
To be clear, I do not believe Paul Ryan is the political athlete Ronald Reagan was.  But let’s not give him the opportunity to appear anywhere close to it.
3. Finally – It is not in Mitt Romney’s nature to make erratic decisions.  Although I don’t quite understand this pick, Romney is too methodical to make a choice like this without gaming out all the options and consequences.
Surely he thoroughly considered that Democrats would pounce on Ryan over medicare.  Could it be that Romney would rather have the scrutiny on his Veep pick so that it takes the target off of him and Bain?  The idea being that Democrats make Ryan their target (the Veep spot has always been obscure to voters), and the target is no longer Romney and Bain?
It’s a theory I haven’t fully explored it – but Ryan/Medicare seems to have already left Romney/Bain in the dust, and I don’t see that changing very soon.

The RP’s Weekly Web Gems: The Politics of The Screen

The Politics of The Screen

We’re 88 days out from Election Day, and The Hollywood Reporter is taking a look back at the best election-themed movies – from ‘Dave’ to ‘All The President’s Men’. [THR]

Add to that list the new election comedy opening today, ‘The Campaign’. Stars Will Ferrell and Zack Galifianakis play two rival candidates in a battle for a North Carolina Congressional seat. You’ll want to see this one. [Trailer] [NYT]

Warner Brothers is holding back the release of ‘The Great Gatsby’ to allow for more time for music and effects, and to give the film a more lucrative summer release date in 2013. [LA Times]

Now, consider the ramifications the date change will have on the 2013 Oscars nods. [NYT]

Snarky film critic Judith Crist died this week. Her reviews were seen on “Today,” in TV Guide and the New York Herald Tribune. One director labeled her “Judas Crist” after a particularly scathing review. [Chicago Sun-Times]

Sneak Preview of “Homeland”

As the fall season approaches, there are few shows that I am more eagerly anticipating that Showtime’s “Homeland.”  Not only did the suspenseful drama keep me enthralled all last year, but the new season is filmed in Tel Aviv! (It is based on an Israeli series.)  Doesn’t get much better than that!

Here’s a sneak preview:

The Recovering Politician Bookstore

     

The RP on The Daily Show