The RP’s Weekly Web Gems: The Politics of Hoops

Politics of Hoops

The finances of Lin’s departure to Houston are more complicated than they appear. See how last summer’s negotiations left a loophole for the Rocket’s back office. [ESPN]

College basketball fans everywhere are drooling over the new ACC match ups set to begin in 2013, but Pitt had to pay a pretty penny to make the jump. [Yahoo]

Oh, so that’s why Nash went to LA. Hollywood is calling. [Grantland]

As usual, USA will be favored in tonight’s rematch of the 2008 Olympic finale. However, the Spaniards’ post presence and team experience may prove to be trouble for the guys in red, white, and blue. [Bleacher Report]

#1 ranked prospect of 2013, Jabari Parker, has an arsenal of offensive talents that will leave you saying, “He’s only how old?!” [Youtube]

The RP Turns 45…In Israel

It’s official:  The RP is a very, very, very old man.

To commemorate the 45th anniversary of the Six Day War (and his ignominious birthday milestone), The RP is traveling the Jewish State with Mrs. RP and an RPette.  The big birthday celebration will be held in Eilat, on a cruise boat in the Red Sea.  At the conclusion, The RP will part the Red Sea, a la Moses.

(Hey, it couldn’t be much more difficult than reaching a World Series of Poker final table!)

Above, The RP is enjoying four of his favorite things:  an RPette, his birthday hat, the State of Israel, and the country’s largest solar installation at Kibbutz Katura in the Negev desert in Southern Israel.

If you want to join in the commemoration of this dreadful day, please feel free to add your birthday wishes in the comments below.

Michael Steele: What’s So Bad About Super PAC-Men?

News that deep-pocketed Las Vegas casino owner Sheldon Adelson gave a whopping $10 million to a pro-Mitt Romney political action committee makes it the largest advertising buy since the Republican candidate became the putative challenger to President Barack Obama. Certainly, such generosity contributed to the Romney campaign-Republican National Committee-Victory Fund troika’s massive $106 million haul last month.

But it is the donations to the “super PACs” that have whipped Democrats into a frenzy and spurred the news media to turn their spotlight on the growing role and influence of these PACs and the individuals who fund their activities.

Such big donations lead some politicians and pundits to paint super PAC donors as nefarious agents corrupting the political process. The political left has especially been critical of the role that these organizations and their donors play since the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in 2010.

Specifically, the high court ruled that “the Government may not suppress political speech based on the speaker’s corporate identity.” In other words, PACs that did not make contributions to candidates, parties or other PACs could accept unlimited contributions from individuals, unions and corporations (both for-profit and not-for-profit) for the purpose of making independent expenditures for “express advocacy or electioneering communications purposes.” Citizens United essentially ensured that corporations would have the right to free speech, just as the unions were enjoying.

The Supreme Court gave little credence to the government’s argument that the First Amendment does not cover corporations because they are not “persons.” Corporations are, after all, the court would note, just “associations of people,” and the First Amendment should protect their right to petition the government.

That being said, most donations to super PACs have come not from corporations but from the wealthy individuals who run them. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the top 100 individual super PAC donors in 2011-12 made up just 3.7 percent of contributors but accounted for more than 80 percent of the total money raised.

Given that labor-union political activities and money favoring Democrats had previously been dominant in federal campaigns, it is interesting to hear the screams of indignation now that Republican-leaning corporate moguls are stepping up their political and financial support.

Of course, super PACs are being criticized specifically for engaging in heavily negative campaign advertising. Yet, like them or not, such attack ads often work to drive up the negatives of opponents. Ironically, despite calls for less negative campaigning by the presidential candidates as well as their respective super PACs, research early in the 2012 campaign indicated that most voters found negative advertising informative and that candidates benefited from negative advertising sponsored by PACs.

The Citizens United case and its aftermath, however, have nothing to do with the fact that the campaign-finance-reform law passed by Congress and from which the Citizens United case was born woefully neglected to include an effective donor-reporting mechanism that could have been an adequate check on the mega-donations made to such PACs. Simply put: Congress should have written full disclosure into the law.

By January 2010, though, at least 38 states and the federal government had come around to requiring disclosure for all or some independent expenditures or election communications — stipulations intended to deter potentially corrupting donations. Yet, despite these laws, many voters go to the polls not knowing who funded those political commercials running incessantly for the past three weeks. In fact, in federal elections, PACs have the option of filing reports on a monthly or quarterly basis, which often means that funds are collected and spent long before the legal filing disclosure is required.

Read the rest of…
Michael Steele: What’s So Bad About Super PAC-Men?

The RP’s Weekly Web Gems: The Politics of Pigskin

The Politics of Pigskin

Chad Ochocinco is once again Chad Johnson (from a reliable source). [OCNN]

Here are pictures of Denver Broncos players meeting with victims of the Aurora Theater shooting. [picture]

Packers guard TJ Lang tweets some advice for other players after the recent string of DUI arrests. [Twitter]

The Chiefs are the only NFL team to start training camp with no player over the age of 30. [Kansas City Star]

Aaron Berry has been released by the Lions after his second arrest this year. This time for assault. [ESPN]

 

John Y’s Musings from the Middle: Being Good While Doing Bad

My version of George Washington’s cherry tree (I cannot tell a lie) story.

If you live long enough in a city you find pieces of yourself –your life–that catch you off guard and bring back a flood of memories.

That happened to me tonight when I went to an to a new ATM off Frankfort Ave. As I looked up I saw a door (see picture) that I recognized. I knew instantly it was a door from a defining moment in my life, when my honesty and character was put to the test.

I was 16 years old and was out one night with my closest high school friend, who I’ll leave nameless. We were discussing sneaking into a movie. A couple left through the door attached to the theater and my friend grabbed the handle and held it open for me.

“C’mon, Johnny! C’mon!! Quick!”

I almost impulsively rushed in. But didn’t. I hesitated just long enough for guilt to seep in and catch my self up….and muster the confidence to whisper bravely “Let’s just go inside and pay.”

I know…that wasn’t as brave a declaration as I’d hoped ….but it spoke volumes about the kind of person I was. My friend didn’t have the money and said we weren’t old enough to get in anyway. He held the door open a few more seconds urging me to sneak in. But I didn’t.

And we left.

And I hadn’t seen that door to the old Crescent Art (porn) theater since that night 33 years ago. The night my character–OK, a small piece of my character–was put to the test. And I passed. By refusing to sneak into a blue movie house without paying.

What a guy, huh? Made me wonder if George Washington felt this way when he’d tell people the cherry tree story. Yeah, of course he did!

Read the rest of…
John Y’s Musings from the Middle: Being Good While Doing Bad

The RP’s Weekly Web Gems: The Politics of Media

News Corp. patriarch Rupert Murdoch resigned from several boards controlling newspapers his company owns, including The Sun, The Times, and The Sunday Times. Growing speculation surrounds the future of his newspaper group. [Telegraph]

Partnership with NBCUniversal makes Twitter the official online “narrator” of the Olympics. [WSJ]

ABC’s Brian Ross caused a stir after he incorrectly linked James Holmes, the Aurora, Colo. shooting suspect, with the Colorado Tea Party Patriots. [Politico]

Larry King is back… but on the Web. The famous former CNN interviewer is hosting ‘Larry King Now’ on Hulu. [LA Times]

PBS President Paula Kerger is disappointed lawmakers are seeking to cut funding for the broadcasting giant. [AP]

NBC’s Bob Costas still tells it like it is. The sportscaster is preparing for Olympic coverage that will feature him prominently. [The Hollywood Reporter]

Where in the World is the RP?

OK, this one’s too easy for a contest.

Instead, we will challenge you to a more important question.

With his new hat, is The RP setting a new fashion trend?  Or is this a major fashion FAIL?

Please comment below

Artur Davis: Jesse’s Drama

Last week, during the alternately sad, alternately voyeuristic coverage of Jesse Jackson Jr.’s troubles, I recalled a night that the Congressman himself has probably forgotten. Sometime in 1996 or 1997, Jackson made a speech at Alabama State University in my hometown, Montgomery. At least one local media outlet confused the young, newly elected representative with his father; a then defensible mistake reflecting the fact that much of America, much less Alabama, did not yet know there was a second generation Jackson rising in his own right.

But Montgomery’s African American professional crowd in their twenties or early thirties knew better, and they turned out to see one of their own generation’s most promising members do a star turn. The speech was good but not memorable—more polished than powerful, no preacher’s hook—but the electricity lingered.  It was a lot of glamour, a lot of promise, just enough inspiration, in a community where “up and coming politician” meant at most future city councilman, at most state senator. This Jackson seemed to have the stuff to take the train much further.  It would not have stunned a man or woman in that aging gymnasium to think that a future president had left a little touch of star dust behind.

I would see Jackson in action a hundred times more. He is one of a handful of House members who can give an authentic floor speech, versus droning through a turgid, staff drafted floor statement. He evolved into the orator whose possibilities were only just in view that night in Montgomery: by the time I watched him speak in Alabama in 2007 as an Obama surrogate, he had the gift nailed, and wasn’t much off Barack Obama’s rhetorical pace: it was a common refrain that day in the audience that Jesse had made the Obama case better than Obama himself had made it in Selma a few months earlier.

The legislator who developed over the last 16 or so years has his defects. Jesse Jr. never turned into a grind-it-out policy technician: his fixation on tacking onto the US Constitution every modern progressive policy plank was quixotic more than serious-minded. He frustrated the Hill crowd by neither reaching for leadership status himself nor aligning with the various power grids that attached around Nancy Pelosi or Steny Hoyer.  In a world were institutional status is sought and lobbied over, Jackson’s coolness to that sort of thing could look like disengagement.

His admirers kept chafing at his reluctance to reach for higher office. The presumed target, a Senate seat in Illinois, was there for the taking in 2004 but Jackson deferred to a black state senator he barely knew who had been mashed pretty badly in a House race four years earlier. In 2007, Jackson took all the steps to challenge another legacy product, Richard Daley, for Mayor, and stepped back again.

The game of politics requires mobility, either toward internal party power or to the next office on the ladder, and a politician who aims for neither is prone to stagnate. I suspect Jesse Jr. felt that tug and it explains the frenzy around his effort to get appointed to the Senate in late 2008 (an effort that did not cross the line into illegality, based on what I have seen, and probably wouldn’t look suspect if the target of persuasion had been anybody but Rod Blagojevich.) While I certainly never heard him express the thought, it would have been inhuman if Jackson didn’t notice that the chits from giving Obama and Daley their space weren’t exactly pouring in. The Obama team, for example, appeared to view Jackson as a ship they had passed on the way, and didn’t even include him on a list of favored suitors for the seat.  The Democratic seers in Illinois lapsed very quickly into chatter that Jackson was too “Chicago” to build a statewide brand, more or less their initial take on Obama in 2003.

Politics is anything but fair and I never heard Jesse complain. The maddening irony, though, was that most of the ingratitude could be seen a mile away, involved people whose mindsets he knew all too well, and still Jackson seemed unprepared.  He actually seemed to prefer to bid in an insider competition, where he had never excelled, instead of trusting his skills in a fight for voters, where his gifts might have enabled him to fare so much better.

It struck me as perplexing when I heard him say he could never raise the money to run a Senate race without the virtue of an appointment, because that deference to conventional wisdom and doubt clashed so thoroughly with the many times he took on the established point of view: becoming a reform ally in Chicago, endorsing Obama for the Senate in 04 when it seemed pointless. A man with unmistakable boldness never seemed to give a second’s worth of thought to a brass-knuckled tactic like announcing he would run in the Senate primary in 2010 no matter what, to test the Democratic machine’s path of least resistance politics.

Read the rest of…
Artur Davis: Jesse’s Drama

The RP’s Weekly Gems: The Politics of the Planet

A European pest has found its way to the US for the first time. [yahoo.com]

 

Climate change is forcing behavioral and evolutionary changes in salmon. [nytimes.com]

 

A 77 mile long iceberg breaks off from Greenland, is this more evidence of climate change? [bbc.co.uk]

 

Lastly, a video of a diver being snuck up on by a 10-foot long shark. [grindtv.com]

Arguments Against Gay Marriage

Since The RP has been very outspoken on the subject of his support for marriage equality. we at The Recovering Politician, in the interests of fairness, hereby provide the counter-argument:

h/t Danielle MacDonald

The Recovering Politician Bookstore

     

The RP on The Daily Show