Created for Joel La Follette’s Trailer Trash Thursday Film Festival at Royal Treatment Fly Shop. All entries had to be under 4:27.
WINNER BEST IN COMEDY TRAILER 2013 “A Moral Steelhead Story” from Jason Atkinson & Flying A Films on Vimeo.
Created for Joel La Follette’s Trailer Trash Thursday Film Festival at Royal Treatment Fly Shop. All entries had to be under 4:27.
WINNER BEST IN COMEDY TRAILER 2013 “A Moral Steelhead Story” from Jason Atkinson & Flying A Films on Vimeo. When it was announced that President Obama was going to be visiting Israel I thought it timely to forward my humble suggestion as to how we can have a breakthrough in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. How about buying from the Palestinians the land they once lived on and is now the state of Israel. For the last several decades, negotiators had tried to curb the violence by seeking a two-state solution. Israel would claim a hands-off policy to a neighboring Palestinian State while the Palestinians would simultaneously acknowledge Israel’s right to exist. The reason this proposal never moved forward is because it did not get to the root of the anger that lies beneath this controversy. In order to fashion a lasting peace, we first have to look back to the manner in which the conflict erupted upon the founding of Israel in 1948. There were four major players in this scenario: the United Nations, the British, the Jewish people and the Palestinians. It is hard to say that any one of these entities was the bad guy. Millions of Jews who were uprooted by Nazi tyranny were, after World War II, in a state of shock with no home and needing to regroup. The U.N., with the best of intentions, looked to provide these dispersed Jewish populations with a singular homeland where they could grieve for their dead and start anew. The British would retreat from its colony after having tried unsuccessfully to fashion a Jewish homeland since the 1917 Balfour Declaration. It was a magnanimous gesture. The only problem is that they created the new nation of Israel on land that many Palestinians had called their own. Palestinians were actually uprooted and forced to flee the area. So, one can see the burning hostility that would boil within the Palestinian people. By the same token, it is hard to expect the Jewish population at this point to have rejected this offer to control their own destiny through their own government. The problem comes in when some inject into the argument that one people has more of a God given right to the land than another. I can’t imagine the person on the losing end of that argument feeling very good about themselves. The Jewish people were merely trying to survive in peace. They were not seeking to conquer their neighbors or to hurt anyone. On the other hand, an angry Palestinian population that was kicked off their land, was feeling a sense of humiliation. They have mistakenly concentrated their anger upon the Jewish population and have vowed revenge. Thus we had attacks on Israel in 1967 and again in 1973. More recently, Israelis have been bombarded with haphazard shellings from over their border. The restraint shown by the Israeli people is incredible. I doubt that Americans would be so restrained if we were being bombed every day from a bordering state. A foreign power attacked our buildings once and we rightfully responded with an overwhelming military fury. Many Arab leaders, who are despots in their own right, have used anti-Semitism as a way to create a nationalistic jingoism to distract their poverty stricken constituents from the leaders’ evil ways. Their schools teach their children to despise Jews are the Devil. Is it any wonder that these younger generations grow up with such hatred toward the Jewish people. But Israel, America and others seeking the long-term survival of Israel must understand the humiliation and the frustration that many of these generations have harbored – in part due to the repression that they face through occupation, and even more so from the fact that they were kicked off of their land without any compensation. What if the U.N. would have been more sensitive to the Palestinian people who were displaced back in 1948? What if instead of kicking them off their land, they offered to buy their land? Israel could have been created without the resentment and the humiliation that came about. Perhaps it’s not too late for that type of justice. Perhaps the way to finally create lasting peace in this area is to recognize that Israel has a right to exist and that the Palestinians who were displaced have a right to compensation for the land they lost. So, instead of us wasting billions of dollars in federal aid to thankless powers such as Pakistan, Egypt and Afghanistan, perhaps our money would be better spent in a one-time payment to the Palestinians for the land that was previously taken from them. The compensation would go far beyond helping people in poverty; it would create a sense of justice for those who feel they were wronged. Only when that sense of resentment is eradicated from the situation, will there be peace of mind for the Palestinian population and peace for all the region that lasts. Part 1 of 4: FINDING A HOME. When we left home we hoped that we’d find the city for us. We’d walk the streets and feel comfortable. We’d savor the foods and feel fine if we got fat there. We’d see the homes and picture ourselves growing old there. It would feel like home. After visiting more than 200 cities, where have we decided to settle? Follow us on the second Wednesday of each month to discover what traveling the world taught us about where we want to call home. The biggest question of all was what do we need in a home? Do we need the creature comforts of the developed world, or do we want the daily adventure of the developing world? HE SAID…Developing vs developed says it all, one is present-tense, happening now, one is past-tense, as in finished. I can’t lie, I love the idea of the developing world, the constant change, the action, the loose liquor laws, but I don’t think it’s for me. The reason to live in the developing world is simple: it’s where money will be made for my generation. As the economies grow, so will the prosperity, get in early, play your cards right, and wealth will be created. Vietnam, one of the places growth is happening today. The downside of the developing world is the lifestyle. Sure I can live great, have a driver to deal with the endless traffic jams, have a housekeeper to clean, and have assorted other staff that I’ll never be certain what they do. Within a walled house everything seems great, but living with the crappy infrastructure, having to send my children to pretentious private schools, and being part of such a vast wealth distribution doesn’t interest me. Read the rest of… The Politics of The Planet
President Obama is expected to unveil his new energy policy today which was first mentioned in The State of the Union last month. The so-called “Energy Security Trust” would use money accrued through royalties received from oil company leases on off shore drilling sites. This revenue, nearly $2 Billion a year, would be used to fund research on alternative forms of energy. Predictably the plan is already getting push-back from Speaker of the House John Boehner who was apparently for this plan before he was against it. A strikingly similar “trust fund” was proposed by the GOP in sec. 321 of their 2009 energy bill which Speaker Boehner introduced and sponsored. Mr. Boehner is not alone in his opposition, Christopher Helman of Forbes explains how the trust could be a back door to a carbon tax and why Congress should nip this policy in the proverbial bud.[Forbes] In the shadow of the “Energy Security Trust” announcement, Andrew Revkin of the New York Times discusses the impact of budget cuts on the scientific community, particularly alternative energy research. Even before sequestration, the amount of the budget which was devoted to such research was negligible. According to a report cited by Revkin, less than 1% of the federal budget goes toward funding for scientific study.[NYT] If global warming is caused by fossil fuels, it could be that the proliferation of alternative energy sources may not come soon enough to save the monarch butterfly. Extreme drought and heat on the North American continent has caused the pollinating insect to decline drastically in number. Climate change may only be part of the story, some are concerned that genetically modified crops could be partly to blame for the extreme downturn in population. Many seeds (including corn and soybean) are modified to tolerate herbicides allowing farmers to eradicate weeds which they deem a nuisance but which are essential to survival of the monarch.[NYT]
Chasing Brown Trout with Ken Burkholder, Jim Root and Jason Atkinson in Oregon’s other time zone.
Spring Skwala from Jason Atkinson & Flying A Films on Vimeo. Are we going to see a bunch of sand? Do we have enough water? Why are we visiting the desert anyways? These are the questions I asked myself as the alarm sounded at an alarmingly early 7AM. The desert doesn’t have much to offer us humans, in fact, the word “inhospitable” comes to mind, inhospitable as in “stay out!” By the end of the day though I was glad we did some desert exploring in the Sinai Peninsula in Egypt. Follow this guy into the desert? Seemed like the start of an Indian Jones movie… Visiting the desert was high on our list of things to do in Jordan, but then we got there. It cost roughly 20 times more than we were prepared to pay, offered less than half of the things we’d want to see, and, to top it all off, seemed like it was going to be way more work than I was willing to expend to be dry roasted. When I saw inexpensive tours from Dahab in the Sinai I thought, “why not?” and signed up for the Colored Canyon and White Desert Safari. Read the rest of…
A well-done analysis of the industrial hemp debate embroiling the Kentucky General Assembly by Russia’s RT. Yes, RUSSIA. No wonder hemp legalization advocate Agriculture Commissioner James Comer is accused of trying to become a hemp czar. Or is it “tsar”? A blessing for the tsar at 3:50: Today marks the 25th anniversary of this Jewish pischer’s baptism into politics. I’d been working for then Tennessee Senator Al Gore’s underdog bid for President for months, but March 8, 1988, “Super Tuesday,” was considered the potential game changer, two decades before “game changer” became a political cliché. Since Lyndon Johnson’s 1964 landslide, Democrats had been wandering in the Electoral College desert, only winning one Presidential election in 1976, in the aftermath of the GOP Watergate meltdown. Our problems had been identified by LBJ himself when he prophesized that Democrats “have lost the South for a generation,” upon his courageous signing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Many blamed a leftward lurch by the party during the final years of Vietnam and the emergence of its George McGovernite wing, unfairly stereotyped as a bunch of hippies favoring “acid, amnesty and abortion.” I had signed up for the 39-year-old Gore’s campaign because of his thoughtful and progressive views on arms control and the environment. But I also believed that as a more moderate Southerner, he could help the Democratic Party end its losing streak and take back control of the White House. Behind the scenes, party moderates and pragmatists had been working on a plan to facilitate the election of a more electable nominee. At the core was the creation of “Super Tuesday” — a day with 21 primaries taking place, including all of the Southern states. The theory was that a Democratic nominee who could win the Southern primaries could win the nation in the fall. As the returns came in 25 years ago today, I excitedly sat in the campaign war room — a 20 year old surrounded by a veteran group of 20- and 30- somethings. (My great friend from that campaign — and No Labels co-founder, Nancy Jacobson — calls me to this day the “campaign mascot.”) I was in charge of keeping track of the vote tallies on the war room chalkboard. (Yes, this is before whiteboards and erasable markers, kids.) Things looked very promising when Al Gore steamrolled through the Upper South: his home state of Tennessee, Arkansas, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and best of all, my old Kentucky home. (Side note: The Kentucky state director for the campaign is to this day, my best frenemy, George Phillips (read about him here). This is the only time in history George has ever celebrated a Kentucky victory — he is, natch, a Dukie.) But, we were losing everywhere else: Jesse Jackson took the Deep South, while Mike Dukakis took the big prizes, Texas and Florida, where liberal voters dominated the primary electorate. While Gore stayed in the race a few more weeks, he was after “Super Tuesday” dead man walking. Dukakis ultimately won the nomination, but as many of us feared, was branded too liberal, and lost in the fall to the first George Bush. But not for a lack of me trying: Well, we heard from Gore later, when he joined a fellow Southerner on the 1992 Democratic presidential ticket that finally turned the party’s fortunes around. So while March 8, 1988 ended up on a sour note, it was a day that changed our country for the better. And it began my love affair with politics, which continues to this day, albeit from outside any war rooms.
What a long, strange week it’s been. A few highlights:
And now, a few conclusions:
From Janet Patton of the Lexington Herald-Leader (who has been doing some incredible reporting on the industrial hemp issue):
Click here to read the full article. |
|
||
Copyright © 2024 The Recovering Politician - All Rights Reserved |